What You Wish You Had Said

There is a particular kind of silence that happens on the drive home after a conversation that did not go the way it should have.

Not the comfortable quiet of a day well spent. The replaying kind. The kind where the words that were said get examined, the words that should not have been said get regretted, and somewhere around the third stoplight, the perfect response finally arrives. Ten minutes too late and completely useless.

Almost every professional who works with people knows this silence. It shows up after the listing appointment that ended without a signature. After the buyer who said they needed more time. After the team conversation that was supposed to create clarity and instead created distance. After the discussion with someone important where the right thing to say seemed so obvious afterward and so completely unavailable in the moment.

For a long time, the assumption was that these moments meant one thing. Better answers were needed. A stronger presentation. A more convincing explanation. The right combination of words to help the other person see things more clearly.

That assumption was wrong. And understanding why it was wrong changed everything about how important conversations are approached.

The Problem That Was Never the Problem

Looking back at the conversations that stayed longest, the ones still replayed years later, there is a consistent pattern that has nothing to do with the quality of the answer given.

The conversations that did not go well were almost never the ones where the wrong thing was said. They were the ones where so much focus was placed on what needed to be communicated that what the other person actually needed went unheard.

A seller who pushed back on price was not primarily objecting to the number. She was expressing something deeper about what the home represented to her family and what moving forward would require her to let go of. A buyer who said he needed more time was not making a logical calculation about market conditions. He was managing a fear that had never been named out loud in that conversation.

Neither of those things could be addressed by a better explanation. Because neither of them had ever been fully understood.

The problem in those conversations was not the answer. It was that the question had never been asked.

What Staying Curious Actually Does

There is a meaningful difference between a conversation where someone is waiting for their turn to respond and one where someone is genuinely trying to understand.

The other person in the conversation feels that difference immediately. Not always consciously. But in the way they hold themselves, in how much they share, in whether they lean in or pull back.

When someone senses that the goal of the conversation is to persuade them, the most natural response is to protect their position. The defense goes up. And the more thorough the explanation that follows, the more entrenched the position becomes. Not because the person is being unreasonable. Because defending a position is exactly what people do when they feel that someone is trying to move them somewhere rather than understand where they are.

When that same person senses genuine curiosity, something different happens. The guard comes down. They begin to share things they might not have shared otherwise. And often, in the act of articulating what they actually think and feel, they begin to work through the decision themselves.

One thoughtful question, asked with real curiosity and followed by real listening, can accomplish more than any explanation ever could. Not because it is clever. Because it creates the conditions for an honest conversation rather than an opposing one.

The Shift That Changes Everything

One of the Four Cornerstones of Influential Communication inside Exactly What to Say® is that the person asking the questions controls the conversation. Not the outcome. The conversation.

That distinction matters more than it might appear to at first. Controlling an outcome means trying to engineer where someone lands. Controlling a conversation means creating the space for someone to think clearly, speak honestly, and move toward a decision that genuinely feels like their own.

The best conversations are not the ones where the most convincing case was made. They are the ones where the other person felt so genuinely understood that the best path forward became visible to both people at the same time.

That shift, from wanting to be persuasive to wanting to understand, is not a technique. It is a different way of thinking about what a conversation is actually for.

And it changes everything. Not just in sales and leadership, but in every relationship where honest communication matters.

The Question Worth Carrying Into Every Conversation

The conversations still replayed on the drive home are rarely the ones where the answer was wrong. They are almost always the ones where curiosity ran out too soon.

Where the explanation began before the understanding was established. Where the response was already forming while the other person was still talking. Where winning the point felt more important in the moment than understanding the person.

Before the next important conversation, one question is worth sitting with.

Is the goal to prove the point, or to understand theirs?

Because what gets said in those first curious minutes, the questions asked before the explanations begin, will almost always determine where the conversation ends.

And far fewer drives home will be spent wishing something had been said differently.

---

Chris Ruszkiewicz is an Exactly What to Say® Certified Guide and the founder of CMR Coaching & Consulting, a founding owner of a Keller Williams Realty office, and an Executive Business Coach with 32 years of experience in sales, negotiation, and leadership.